Tasi 2nd homes, IMU and agricultural question ‘bolted’ in the 2016 Stability Law – Blasting News

The Government raises the possibility of IMU and Tasi merge into a single set only on second homes, putting an end to the tax on services indivisible, cd ‘Tasi’. To confirm the proposed unification of the two taxes IMU and Tasi is just the Economy Undersecretary, Enrico Zanetti, who pointed out that the amendment in question will concern, if it were approved, only the ‘second homes ‘ .

Taxation on Properties

It is really a tax reform that real estate on which the government is discussing and that will be inserted in the Stability Law 2016?

Unfortunately, no. What is in the pipeline is a move that will facilitate so the owners of the property, but only in terms of payment of taxes. In fact, it will be shot down only ideally the tax because, in fact, will result in the reunification of the sum of the two tax rates .

‘s main house , however, we are evaluating ‘ the total abolition hypothesis , also for luxury homes (villas, castles, etc.). Zanetti confirms that the Government is committed to introducing in the 2016 Stability Law – which will be approved by October 15 cm – Three measures that will affect the taxation of local authorities, namely:

• abolition of tax on first homes;
• ‘s abolition IMU on agricultural land , including those subject to taxation even before the Decree Law. 66/2014 (the bonus income tax of 80.00 euro);
• resolution of the cd matter IMU bolted , namely the tax on machinery, equipment and systems used by companies, notwithstanding the intention to establish a regulatory level that the cadastral income of the properties in the special setting, censibili in cadastral group D, is made by direct estimate, including land, buildings and anything that is connected to them, but excluding, of course, the ‘machinery’ .

Second Homes

merging tax IMU and Tasi only for housing other than the primary, then, is another measure, in addition to the three listed above . However, the government’s position does not aim at a real reduction surgery property tax; In fact, the level of taxation will not be affected, especially in a reductive way; having to proceed only to add up the respective rates. It will therefore only a bureaucratic and administrative simplification.