The lower middle class is the hard core of Italy. A country suffering, but with a great wealth: the house, ill-treated by governments Monti, Letta and Renzi. Of what remains of Italy, in fact, 82.6 percent of the owners of the first house are actually where the head of household is a pensioner, a worker, an employee or an unemployed.
The figure emerges from an evaluation made by the Studies Office of Cgia on the results of a survey of the Bank of Italy which took the form on the budgets of over 8 thousand families.
The other 17.4 per cent, however, is made up of families of executives, entrepreneurs and self-employed. Made 100 total owners of first house in Italy, retirees are 43.7 percent, 17.9 employees, workers and the unemployed to 17.4 to 3.6. The other nuclei include the self-employed and managers (6.2 percent each) and entrepreneurs / freelancers to 5 percent.
The abolition of Tasi on first homes will only come, as promised by Matteo Renzi, in 2016. But it is likely to be the usual red herring, where the government will recover the loss of revenue? And if they were to take the safeguard clauses? One certainty: if you live in a luxury property will continue to pay the IMU also in 2016.
A single certainty: if you live in a luxury property will continue to pay the IMU also in 2016 .
But Italians can not however miss the year-end, when they are called upon to pay the second installment of the odious tribute to the services indivisible, which stems from the municipal services, namely those aimed homogeneously to the whole community that benefits equally, with inability to quantify the use by the individual citizen and the benefit that draws the same.
“Before giving the final farewell to the Tasi – recalls Cgia coordinator, Paul Zabeo – Italians will have to pay the second installment of the tax for the current year by next December 16 “.
The Italians will have to pay? “The average amount that the owners of the first home pay will amount to around EUR 100. For second homes, however, the cost will amount to about 450 euro. ”
On the taxation of second homes, Zabeo pains to point out: “There are increasingly frequent cases in which to be owners of a second home are not wealthy families who spend their holidays in the seaside villa or chalet mountain, but ordinary citizens who have inherited the house of the parents. ”
Not to mention the Italians who have had to move to another region, for example, for business or family.
“Living in a new house for rent, are therefore forced to pay the IMU and the native country of Tasi on housing in the meantime has become a second home. It would be appropriate that the auditors were able to monitor these specificities, easing the tax burden for those who find themselves in this situation, “suggests Zabeo.
The call will be received? No, most likely. Even in light of the financial difficulties of hundreds of thousands of municipalities, who do not know even how to close budgets, almost everyone, rich flaws.
The next year, however, municipalities may resort to “supertasi” , canceled the taxes on first homes. It will then apply on second homes and on buildings used (offices, shops and hotels) that could be worth, the first estimates, a “bloodletting” 1.5-2 billion.
In 2016, in fact, there is a “suspension” of the increases in local levies, with the exception, however, of the possibility of applying an additional 0.8 per thousand already planned for 2014 and 2015 and extended to 2016 without being more connected to the introduction of contextual deductions.
No comments:
Post a Comment