“It is clear that there may be adjustments on the sidelines but I am convinced that Parliament will recognize the overall validity of the maneuver and will vote.” So Pier Carlo Padoan Ballarò which defines non-negotiable, “the tax cuts as well as interventions in favor of investment and young researchers.”
The abolition of IMU and Tasi is an electoral maneuver? “I note a banality – said Economy Minister Pier Carlo Padoan – any measure of economic policy, any cutting taxes has an implication of such election, not hide behind a finger,” but it is “a step that reinforces families are the ones that have suffered the most of the crisis. “
As for the controversy for raising the limit to 3,000 euro cash Padoan replied:” I respect the opinion Canton but claim the right to change his mind, because the evidence tells me that it is true that in countries where there is more cash is more evasion. ” “The problem of evasion – he said – should be set in another way and that is what the government is doing. The point is not whether I pay in cash, the issue is whether the shopkeeper gives me a receipt, what is the real problem, “ .
The spending review “was until now seen mainly in terms of large numbers of course are important. But the spending review should be more and more, and this year even though the law of stability rarely seen behind the numbers, an appropriate choice, almost surgical item of expenditure. ”
“ The safeguard clauses will defuse with what we’re doing ” , he said then. “ At the end of the process, the time horizon of the government in 2018, we will have defused 36 billion of 72 and will continue to do so in the next stability law. The variables are all in the right direction: the income and employment go up, the debt falls, the deficit is reduced, the safeguard clauses are reduced. If we keep the bomb will not explode and definitely not going on “ .
‘A quarrel between me and Renzi? This story has been going on when I do this job and I’m tired of deny, “also says the minister, explaining that the law of stability ‘we, as usual, exchanged opinions. The amount of spending in the narrow sense in which we came up with this law is pretty much what we had said in April Def. Remain 4 billion in tax breaks “because removing it would be” in fact, the tax increases. “
As for pensions:” Our system is one of the most robust, stable and sustainable in Europe and the Western world and we must maintain this stability. Given this premise I am absolutely in favor to consider flexible mechanisms in output. All this must be reasoned calmly. So is the government agenda but was not on the agenda of this law of stability. ” And on esodati, “the problem, as I understand it is a problem that will auto play. They say esodati citizen groups that have their sacrosanct demands but technically are not esodati the first hour. As we said in Parliament must find a permanent solution. “
No comments:
Post a Comment