Pensions 2015: agree on penalties, speaks Damiano – Blasting News

you should reach agreements on penalties. It is understood by the recent statements of the President of the Labour Commission of the Chamber Cesare Damiano , which would propose a new mechanism which would diversify the penalty of the check that would be established based on the amount of the check social security .

Seventh safeguard option and woman before the Stability Law

“On the issue of pensions should be avoided mistakes and improvisations. Before the Stability Law should be resolved problems of the so-called Option Woman and Seventh safeguard, “said the deputy of the Democratic Party. As we learn from the news website “Pensions Today”, in fact, the primary goal of Government Renzi is ensure a seventh safeguard measure esodati workers were excluded from the previous protection that due the introduction of the Reformation Fornero have not had the opportunity to access to retirement and to make matters worse were no social security coverage. Another important step that the government will have to make is the extension of ‘ option contributory woman to 2018, in order to allow female employees to stop early to work after reaching at least 57 years of chronological age accompanied by 35 years of contribution payments provided that their check is calculated entirely from the contribution method. Interventions that should be made before the processing of the new budget that likely will come into force from next year.

Penalties from the magnitude of the check

In the Stability Law, instead, it should be dealt with the issue of the flexibility outbound taking into account the idea developed by the Damiano on the output from the 62 years of age and 35 years of actual contributions worth a maximum reduction of 8% on the check pension or alternatively, it would take at least 41 years of contributions regardless of age registry and without facing penalties. “You can also find less expensive solutions” Damiano specifies that demonstrates its diasponibilità in differentiating the penalty based on the amount of the check social security.

The hypotheses less appetitibili remain however, the interpretation given by INPS President Tito Boeri on the recalculation contributory and flexibility at no cost assumed by the Deputy Minister of Economy Enrico Morando.