Milan – A Tito Boeri in the round does not skimp on the hits of Parliament, guilty – in his view – had prevented the sending of ‘orange envelope’ Italians, the INPS document containing a projection of pension. But the president of the Institute for Security does not give back to the office on the request to facilitate the exit from work for older people, those left scalded by the reform Fornero, using the budgetary margins that Brussels can offer Italy. The orange envelope. The failure to send the ‘orange envelope’ INPS, those that allowed citizens to be informed on the estimates of retirement, there are “rumors that it was done because we have proposed cutting the annuities. If he it would be a very serious matter, “said Boeri in Interview by Maria Latella, SkyTg24 . President INPS explained that the shipment of these envelopes “we did not request more money to the government, asked only to be able to move the amounts within the budget of INPS, seeing as we have a spending quota for delivery overseas, and could well fetch it from other chapters of our budget. ” The result is that “we asked this flexibility, but – said Boeri – twice someone in Parliament has made this trip up to take off these two lines by amendment” provided for under the Stability 2016. Back to the demand for output. As mentioned, the controversy towards Paralamento was not the only subject. Indeed, the Boers launched a proposal to be discussed: the more flexibility that could allow Europe should be used to make the output from more flexible labor. According to a number of INPS, the words of European Commission Vice President, Valdis Dombrovskis, “leave the room to get some more flexibility” respecting the sustainability of public finances. “And ‘it can without violating European rules – he added – and at the same time doing something useful for young people”, for example “ask for flexibility to finance immediate maggiora a flexible output of pensions” according to sustainability criteria. As known, the INPS has already developed a reform of the pension system, but was not considered feasible from Palazzo Chigi. Good Jobs Act, the poor are social emergency. Boeri has also reserved positive comments on the activities of government, in particular the labor reform: “The data that we collect and collect show a strong increase in hiring immediately with contracts indefinitely and I expect this trend further increases in the figures for November and December: in my opinion there will be a fillip, “said emphasizing again that, however, we must also make do” a series of operations including the exit towards flexible pensions “. The Italian framework remains fragile then: “During this crisis, between 2008 and 2015, poverty rates in Italy have increased only for those who had less than 65 years. For over 65 years we have tools basic assistance against poverty, under no. ” The warning is clear: “If we go on like this happen what happened during this crisis, young people will see an increase in their poverty.” The goal is “to build instruments of contrast for those under 65 years.” Reaffirming concepts clear for him, he explained that the emergency are not esodati: “The emergency is that of the poor and of people losing jobs and having more than 55 years. This is the real social emergency in Italy. The ‘ Emergency in Italy are the poor because poverty has increased a lot, “said Boer, adding that with the safeguards there are people who take a pension from 10.6 thousand euro per month:” This tells us that the mechanism does not work well, if we have to give in the name of emergency social pensions means that that amount is not social emergency. In Italy there is a system of basic social assistance as in the other countries. “
- Arguments:
- inps
- pension
- flexibility
- flexibility pensions
- Starring:
- Tito Boeri
No comments:
Post a Comment