If the national public employment contracts were renewed for all employees, over the years ranging from 2010 to 2015, the cost would not be less than 35 billion euro. The figure comes by the state, put pen to paper in the memoirs prepared for the hearing by the Advisory on the constitutionality of the block of the salaries in the PA, scheduled for June 23. Not only that, the Attorney General also calculates future spending, providing “a structural effect of around 13 billion annually.” The defenders of the State also remember as now between the constitutional principles there is also a balanced budget. But unions are there and the two acronyms authors of the appeal immediately replicate: the Confsal Unsa talk about numbers “inflated” and Phil estimates made “to put pressure on the Court.” Memories, thirty pages, were signed by the lawyer of the State, Vincenzo Rago, on May 28, less than a month from the hearing and in a warm period in terms of judgments, since the end of April the Court It ruled on the non-indexation of pensions. A decision which was followed by the government decree on repayments and a broad debate with the Minister of Economy Pier Carlo Padoan who recently had hoped for “the future” a ‘”interaction with government and Advocacy”, in the presence implications for public finance, “more fruitful”.
In detail, in the memories Advocacy states that “the significant financial effects of regulatory intervention that looks are obvious. And in fact – continues – the burden arising from the contracting of national level, for period 2010-2015, relative to all public employees, could not be less than 35 billion euro, with a structural effect of around 13 billion euro, as from 2016 “. In addition, the Attorney General notes that “in any case, the trade union prerogatives are safeguarded and are estrinsecate, among other things, the participation in the negotiations for the conclusion of supplementary agreements (CCNI), albeit within the financial limits set by law” and “framework contracts”. Then, he adds, he is still standing a chance “to give rise to the procedures relating to national collective agreements, albeit only for that portion legislation”. In short, highlights, this shows how “intense bargaining has been carried out, even on slopes of the new body of law, and has affected both the bargaining that the national team.” Just then were also unlocked some items before frozen or placed (from green to career progression to falling roofs for seniority and for the second level). According to the Attorney General also, which also cites various judgments of the Court in support, the blocking of bargaining in PA responds to objectives, riconducili two constitutional principles: the first is the rationalization and containment of public spending “not only in relation to the current phase of economic and financial crisis, but in structural terms” so ‘to avoid budgetary imbalances ; while the second concerns “the guarantee of a contribution equally distributed” to “all the components of the public.” Particularly critical acronyms that have promoted the use: according to the secretary general of the UNSA Confsal, Massimo Battaglia, the numbers of advocacy are “designed to scare: this is no longer a republic founded on work but on a balanced budget.” So the other appellant, the Phil and all the other unions, from the categories of the public of Cgil, Cisl and Uil, underlining: “Millions of public workers expect justice from the Constitutional Court ruling, but they know very well which it is the government to hold firm contracts “. So now we have to wait on June 23, when the consultation will be speaking about. On the issue a few days ago the Minister of PA, Marianna Madia, had noted that there has already been a judgment and has certified the constitutionality of the block, he explained, “the initiatives taken by the Government have respected the judgment”, since there were also the “80 euro”.
No comments:
Post a Comment