In light of the request by the Board of Public Works of the new documents, the 5 Star Movement speaks of a “shipwreck announced”; for the deputy mayor instead there is no “harsh criticism”, but only an integration of documents “
PESCARA – The councilors M5S comment in the note, which is shown below, the request for other documents relating to the Port Master Plan by the Ministry of Pescara.
C ome one tsunami arrived the Opinion of the Board of Public Works, requested by the Port of Pescara in the context of the approval of the Port Master Plan.
The Ministry has identified weaknesses of the different aspects fundamentals such as hydraulic-maritime, fire safety, the economic and financial assessments and those relating to plant infrastructure. And these deficiencies have been so heavy that the Superior Council was not g infrequently to issue the requested opinion, but it had to be limited to prescribe a long series of additional documents which deepen the areas of intervention.
Insights and studies on essential elements that the Superior Council “scolds”, both the City of Pescara that the Abruzzo Region, had left out and affecting the flow with which evaluate the risk floods highlighting, in fact, that the dangerous tendency all’esondazione Pescara river was not appropriately considered by the analysis of the PRP, and that the flow to be taken into considerations are considerably higher than those analyzed.
In fact, the report says the Ministry, in ensuring the protection of public safety and property exposed to flood risk, you should investigate the security levels of urban areas along the banks of the river for a stretch much broader than that so far investigated in the study hydraulic support of PRP.
Also for the sprinkler system, for the service of vigilance and prevention works designed, missing references and technical elements of assessment in the project of the new PRP, so they can not even express an opinion on the matter, despite the presence and management of docks which will dock tankers. If this were not enough, in the opinion shows that the project “provides considerable amounts of spending relative to fittings, equipment” and that, for this reason, should contain more on building installations and infrastructure of the new electromechanical trim port.
Last but not least, the Ministry has asked to review the economic and financial evaluation of the work, whereas the analysis is now dated to 2008, and despite the lack of all the ads integrated assessments of the port system between Pescara Abruzzo, Vasto and Ortona, instead, in the premises were placed at the base of the planning decisions of the project. “The Ministry – said Councillor Erika Alessandrini – writes in black and white that this colossal project for more than 200 million euro, includes the creation of new traffic without having analyzed the actual needs for both passenger traffic is about to producers: in a few words tell us to redo all accounts well and considerations expansion because we are in danger of throwing away unnecessarily large part of these public money! “
” Given the importance of the documentation required by the Superior Council of Public Works, “- added the penta starred Sabatini, Alessandrini and Di Pillo -” is difficult to understand the optimism that transpires from the statements of the Deputy Mayor Del Vecchio and the Governor Luciano D’Alfonso who give PRP as almost approved . Think, rather, to quickly solve the problem of the breakwater and the maintenance of the harbor, that force us to spend a flood of public money every year. “
The Movement 5 Stars already before the election last May, with public meetings and debates, as well as in the City Council has always strongly opposed the approval of this project, drawing attention to the lack of risk assessment of flooding and the excessive use of public money for work that seems reasonably can serve more to a pharaoh that city. And today, as more and more often the case, a prestigious body as the Ministry supports our own considerations and we snatches from the mouth yet another “we we told you so!”
Del Vecchio in the replication of the Port Master Plan: “ But as harsh criticism, the Board of Public Works asks only an integration of documents”
“It is not clear if the tone of the note signed by the councilors pentastellati Erika Alessandrini and Massimiliano Di Pillo and the national coordinator Massimo Di Renzo on the Port Master Plan is jubilant because they feel that the PRP will never be approved, or if instead, the signatories of the note have perhaps not understood the scope of the requests made by the Board of Public Works.
The optimism that I, along with the regional president Luciano D’Alfonso puts in a speedy adoption of the expected instrument, indispensable to overcome the many problems that today make insufficiently viable port facilities towns, lies solely in the overall and comprehensive analysis of the observations was made in several meetings with the participation of all stakeholders interested since they were issued.
In fact Region, City, Harbour, Basin Authority and the professionals who prepared the PRP are committed since the middle of December to provide what is asked, then since the Council of Public Works has requested additions and updates of data and further analysis with respect to the plan excerpt of the floods, who are preparing with the different actors. Is by no means a slam then, as instead refer pentastellati, but, more realistically, a simple integration.
Aware of this and of the absolute necessity of reaching approval Ultimately the Port Master Plan, we will use time reminders to respond to the findings of the Board of Public Works. The hope is that the councilors of the Movement Five Stars can find satisfaction from achieving this goal, whose interest is not only for the benefit of the city of Pescara, but the entire regional economy “.
No comments:
Post a Comment