public managers, the merit is not there. “Awards for everyone, just the age” – Quotidiano.net

Rome, July 11, 2016 – AND IF WE thought the minister Marianna Madia revolutionize remuneration structures of public managers Italian? The study of Bank of Italy on ‘Incentives and evaluation of public managers in Italy’ – technically an occasional paper entrusted to economists Occhilupo Roberta and Lucia Rizzica – sounds the alarm to all the high bureaucracy of the country (ministerial and regional ) that on the eve of the summer holidays is rediscovered in the double crosshairs of the citizens and the government. July is the month in which the executive would affect. Assault on the leadership?

The Palazzo Koch study tells an area of ​​innovation durable privilege. The research takes as reference the earnings results for 2012 to 2159 Ministry managers and a qualified sample of regional leaders. “On average – among the ministerial – the result of pay is equal to about 9% of total pay for the first level executives and 12% for those of the second.”

Resounding that the voice of paycheck linked to the target achieved represents 9% of the salary (of a manager ‘type’ first band) and then removing the achievement of results authentic incentive function. This asymmetry between bombastic statements guided by merit and much more ragionieristiche accounting practices is mathematical representation on remuneration of the regional leadership whose results increases are trivially anchored to ‘ age (each additional year of seniority worth the 6 %). Again: “The possession of a title of postgraduate study, the knowledge of foreign languages, previous work experience do not affect the outcome of salary.”

“ALL TRUE, unfortunately “, he admits the union of Unadis , whose general secretary Barbara Casagrande calls” uniform rules “, deforestation of the” retributive jungle “and new performance of” metering “,” No more rich administrations and poor administration. Enough with strict government administrations and more flexible. ” According Unadis, would forward to “a single national framework collective agreement,” flanked by “supplementary headquarters” with really apical recruitment “selective and meritocratic.”

It appears however, according to Bank of Italy, the whole ‘l’ ineffectiveness of the <'p> According to the researchers,” Some Aspects of the system outlined by the Madia reform seem to respond to the critical issues highlighted. ” But attention, the bureaucracy has coached the art of rebound. And to win the hand, the minister of public administration will have to overcome an extraordinary force of inertia.